A Data Loss Prevention (DLP) policy is designed precisely for this scenario: to prevent the accidental sharing of sensitive information (like salary data) in real-time across services like Teams, SharePoint, and Exchange. It can detect defined keywords or patterns and block the share attempt, which is proactive. Sensitivity labels (B) are more about classification and persistent protection, not automatic blocking based on content. Communication Compliance (C) is for monitoring and investigating after the fact, not prevention. Restricting all file sharing (D) is too broad and hinders legitimate work.

Team templates are the correct tool for pre-defining team structures with specific settings, including channel creation permissions and private channel settings. You can create a “Finance Department” template with restrictive settings and a “Marketing Campaign” template with flexible settings. When each department creates their team, they select the appropriate template, ensuring consistency. Team-level settings (A) are possible but not scalable or enforceable as a standard. Team membership policies (C) govern what features users have across *all* their teams, not settings for a specific team. Upgrade policies (D) relate to migrating from Skype for Business to Teams.

Cloud recordings are stored in the OneDrive for Business of the user who starts the recording (the meeting organizer). If that user’s OneDrive storage is full, the recording feature will be disabled to prevent failed uploads. This is a common, often overlooked dependency. The user’s own policy is correct (as stated). The organizer’s policy (B) is relevant, but in this scenario, the user *is* the potential organizer reporting the issue. Transcription (C) is a separate, optional setting. While 1:1 calls (D) don’t have cloud recording, the question implies a scheduled meeting context.

The “For everyone” setting allows both internal and external registration. The “Manually approve registrants” option gives organizers full control. They can approve internal employees and assign them the “Presenter” role upon approval, while approving external attendees with the “Attendee” (view-only) role. This provides the granular control required. Option B fails because it excludes external attendees entirely. Option C is unreliable as registration form data doesn’t automatically control the Teams role assignment. Option D creates a disjointed experience and doesn’t integrate internal presenters with the external audience in a single webinar.

The Teams admin center provides centralized management and monitoring for Teams Rooms devices. The “Manage” section shows vital health metrics, connection status, and active alerts (like app crashes, account issues, or peripheral disconnections). Checking here first is efficient and remote, likely revealing the root cause (e.g., an app failure or account problem) without needing to visit the room. Remote restart (A) or password checks (D) might be subsequent steps based on what the health portal shows. A physical reboot (C) should be a later step if remote management indicates a hardware hang.

The `Get-CsTeamTemplate` cmdlet is used to retrieve information about team templates that exist in the Microsoft Teams tenant. The `-Identity` parameter specifies which template to fetch. It returns the template’s properties (like name, description, defined channels, apps, and settings) for review. It does not list teams created from it (B), apply it (C), or create a new template (D). Those actions would require different cmdlets like `Get-Team`, `New-CsTeamTemplate`, or `Set-CsTeamTemplate`.

Meeting organizers have control over specific in-meeting experiences via the ‘Meeting options’ page, accessible before or during a meeting. One of these options is “Together mode,” where the organizer can select a specific scene and set it as the default for all participants. This is an organizer-controlled setting, not solely a user preference (D) or a tenant-wide policy (C). While participants can turn it off individually, the organizer can set the initial default.

An expiration policy is the built-in Teams governance feature designed specifically for this scenario. It automatically triggers a renewal/archival process for teams that have been inactive for a specified period (e.g., 180 days). Owners are notified and can renew the team; if not renewed, it is automatically archived (soft-deleted), cleaning up the list without immediately destroying data. A naming convention (B) is helpful but doesn’t automate cleanup. A retention policy (C) deals with content lifecycle (delete/keep files) but does not archive or remove the Team itself. Manual deletion (D) is unreliable and not scalable.

Team-level settings in the admin center can be grayed out when a corresponding user-level policy (like a Messaging Policy) is in effect and set to ‘Always On’ or ‘Always Off’ for a user in that team. Policies applied to users take precedence over team-level settings. The admin center UI reflects this conflict by disabling the control. It’s not primarily a permissions issue (B), as you can access the page. Team templates (C) define initial settings but don’t typically lock them from later admin editing. While bugs exist (D), policy precedence is the designed, most common reason.

A Data Loss Prevention (DLP) policy is designed precisely for this scenario: to prevent the accidental sharing of sensitive information (like salary data) in real-time across services like Teams, SharePoint, and Exchange. It can detect defined keywords or patterns and block the share attempt, which is proactive. Sensitivity labels (B) are more about classification and persistent protection, not automatic blocking based on content. Communication Compliance (C) is for monitoring and investigating after the fact, not prevention. Restricting all file sharing (D) is too broad and hinders legitimate work.0